AMP Head of Investment Strategy and Chief Economist, Dr Shane Oliver and Deputy Chief Economist, Diana Mousina explain what effects the Federal Budget could have on the Australian economy.
This Budget yet again benefits from a huge revenue windfall allowing a surplus this year for the first time in 15 years and cost of living relief. At the same time, medium term deficits, while lower, remain leaving the budget vulnerable to anything that upsets the “rivers of gold” flowing to Canberra.
Key measures, many of which were announced prior, include:
Changes to the Government’s forecasts have been modest with higher inflation and lower unemployment this financial year but no changes to its forecasts for economic growth. It has revised up its wages forecasts for the next financial year and now sees the return of real wages growth in mid-2024. Unemployment is still seen as rising to 4.5% but doesn’t get there until mid-2025. We are a bit less optimistic on growth in the year ahead and hence see higher unemployment earlier. Either way Australia is set to enter a per capita recession. The Government now sees net immigration of 400,000 this year up from a forecast of 235,000 in October, taking population growth to 2% for the first time in 14 years, slowing to 315,000 in 2023- 2024. The Government revised up its medium term iron ore price assumption but only to $US60/tonne. With the iron ore price now about $US105/tonne, it’s still a potential source of revenue upside.
This Budget like all of those since 2020 has benefitted from huge revenue flows coming from a combination of higher personal tax collections due to stronger jobs and wages growth, higher commodity prices and higher non mining profits than assumed. It looks like “rivers of gold” flowing to Canberra but it’s really good luck flowing from conservative forecasts regarding jobs, wages, inflation and commodity prices. This windfall (see the line called “parameter changes” in the next table) is estimated to reduce the deficit this financial year by $42b compared to last October’s forecast, with carry over to next year before slowing as unemployment rises. Some of the windfall has been spent (see the line called “new stimulus”) but 86% of it out to 2026-27 has been saved. As a result, the budget is now projected to be in surplus for this year – its first since 2007-08, a massive turnaround from the $99b deficit projected less than 18 months ago and the fastest improvement as a share of GDP since the end of WW2 when the deficit went from 10.5% of GDP in 1944-45 to 0.8% in 1946-47. While there is net new stimulus going forward (mainly in 2024-25) due to the cost of living measures it turns negative by 2026-27 (as Budget savings kick in) and over the next four years is swamped by the revenue windfall resulting in lower budget deficits going forward.
Projections for spending as a share of GDP remain above the pre-COVID average of 24.8% but are lower than previously, with Budget measures restricting spending growth to 0.6%pa out to 2026-27. Revenue trends higher (partly due to tax measures in the Budget) as a share of GDP reaching its 1986-87 record of 26.2% in a decade.
While the Budget has seen a rapid turnaround from deficit to surplus this year and has made better progress in reducing the medium term structural deficit, it still persists through the next decade only gradually falling.
Thanks to lower deficits, gross public debt is now projected to be far lower as a share of GDP, with the $1t level now pushed out two years to 2026.
Winners include low and middle income households; pensioners; single parents; medicine users; GPs; aged care workers; low income renters; JobSeeker recipients;
small businesses; the build to rent sector; skilled migrants;
and the environment. Losers include gas producers; vapers and smokers; some prospective NDIS recipients; consultants to the public sector; high balance super members; and travellers ($10 more to leave Australia).
The Budget has a lot to commend it including the cost of living measures will help ease pressure on the most vulnerable and some (energy, medicine and rent relief) will lower measured inflation; the budget is now back in surplus for this financial year; by “saving” the bulk of the revenue upgrade budget deficits are lower and this cuts interest costs; the Government has slowed structural spending growth (e.g. in the NDIS) and raised extra revenue; and there is still scope for revenue surprise with commodity price assumptions.
However, the Budget has several weaknesses:
With the Budget overall taking more out of the economy than it’s putting back in compared to what was projected last October, it’s hard to see significant implications for the RBA but it will be wary of the boost to households from the cost of living measures which could boost spending.
Cash and term deposits – cash and bank deposit returns have improved substantially with RBA rate hikes but are still relatively low.
Bonds – budget deficits add to upwards pressure on bond yields but at least they have been lowered near term so there should be no new pressure.
Shares – the Budget is a small positive for household spending but not enough to offset the negatives impacting the sector; and overall there is not really a lot in it for the share market.
Property – the housing measures are unlikely to alter the property price outlook which is dominated by supply shortages and surging immigration versus the impact of rate hikes. We see roughly flat home prices this year.
The $A – the Budget is unlikely to change the direction for the $A.
If you have any queries relating to the above articles or any other financial planning queries, please contact the office on 03 9375 4286.
Lisa Papachristoforos
Hughes O’Dea Corredig Private Wealth Pty. Ltd.
Trading as HOC Private Wealth
Level 2 / 333 Keilor Road ESSENDON VIC 3040Lisa.Papachristoforos@hoc.com.au
Categorised in: Articles